|
Alfa Pages A forum for help with the Alfasud And Alfa 33 |
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Eddie W Alfa 33
Joined: 31 Jul 2003 Posts: 375 Location: new zealand
|
Posted: Sat Nov 15, 2003 9:03 pm Post subject: Performance Air Filters |
|
|
HI all
Here in NZ a number of the racing guys swear that the standard air filter configeration gives better results than a seperate filter setup. Naturally they are using performance elements if at all. Allowing for cold air supply to iether system, is the difference in the extra inlet tract length provided by the curved elbows from carb to filter box? Would a twin pod setup,placed to collect cold air on iether side of the rad,and a properly designed plenum over each carb not be an improvement? Does anyone have experience in this area? I will be interested in any info.
Regards Eddie |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Serpent33 Alfa Sprint
Joined: 06 May 2003 Posts: 210 Location: Singapore
|
Posted: Sat Apr 24, 2004 3:07 pm Post subject: Re: Performance Air Filters |
|
|
Eddie W wrote: |
HI all
Here in NZ a number of the racing guys swear that the standard air filter configeration gives better results than a seperate filter setup. Naturally they are using performance elements if at all. Allowing for cold air supply to iether system, is the difference in the extra inlet tract length provided by the curved elbows from carb to filter box? Would a twin pod setup,placed to collect cold air on iether side of the rad,and a properly designed plenum over each carb not be an improvement? Does anyone have experience in this area? I will be interested in any info.
Regards Eddie |
The original air box has an intake with a duct to collect cold air from the front. Unfortunately, the S3 has a bigger radiator, covering the area. And also the air con compressor is in the way. I have too been thinking of modifying this system. The standard inlet tract if you look carefully is trumpeted. I am considering porting the edges for a wider flare, say 5mm increase in diametre of flare. _________________ Each time I speed I say, "Dear lord, make me fast and accurate..." |
|
Back to top |
|
|
alfa-alex Alfa Arna
Joined: 24 Apr 2004 Posts: 24 Location: gloucester. uk
|
Posted: Sun Apr 25, 2004 11:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
when i bought my 33 1.7 16V (fuel injection model) it already had a pipercross performance air filter instead of the standard air box. on cold mornings it used to run better, i attributed this to the filter sucking in warm air from the engine bay.
to combat this i ran a piece of ducting from the hole in the bumper (next to the fog light) to the hole in the engine bay where the standard air box takes its cold air from.......makes a big difference but next i want to place the air filter just behind the bumper next to the fog light...anyone tried this yet?!?! would be interested to hear your views |
|
Back to top |
|
|
paddy granger Alfa Sprint
Joined: 12 Aug 2003 Posts: 248
|
Posted: Sun Apr 25, 2004 12:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
We have a K&N panel filter in our S3. Does the open filter system with ram pipe really provide that much more cool air than the standard layout with K&N panel filter? The panel filter is pretty big anyway, and the standard inlet tube surely won't be any smaller in diameter than a custom ram pipe. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Serpent33 Alfa Sprint
Joined: 06 May 2003 Posts: 210 Location: Singapore
|
Posted: Sun Apr 25, 2004 4:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
paddy granger wrote: |
We have a K&N panel filter in our S3. Does the open filter system with ram pipe really provide that much more cool air than the standard layout with K&N panel filter? The panel filter is pretty big anyway, and the standard inlet tube surely won't be any smaller in diameter than a custom ram pipe. |
Well the first two posts were about the carb models. For the injected ones, 16v does come with a larger intake tract in the standard box. But the diametre seems small and it's anyway not leading to any where far from the hot air area. The compartment does allow easy fabrication of an insulation 'wall' and have the cone filter within that area. I've had a hole cut in front of the bumper to lead cold air into that area in the past (ie engine). _________________ Each time I speed I say, "Dear lord, make me fast and accurate..." |
|
Back to top |
|
|
James Granger Alfa 33
Joined: 10 Apr 2003 Posts: 302
|
Posted: Tue May 18, 2004 10:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Paddy's my bro and as he mentioned we have the standard setup with K&N filtercharger. It runs great, but the inlet is obviously hidden behind the front bumper, which obstructs the airflow greatly. Basically the rear side of the front bumper is like a vacuum, so I'm convinced that there is a slight power gain to be made with another setup.
I'm tempted to run a long tube from the filter box down to the small grille near the RHS foglight - basically a ram pipe. This would mean a totally free air supply. The drawbacks are that the lack of anything in front of the inlet (other than that small grille), would result in the filter getting potentially very dirty. At the moment the bumper protects flies, spray, and other stuff from being sucked up into the filter housing. Therefore if I do go down this route, I'd probably fit very fine gauze over the inlet hole, although even this would not stop spray from being sucked in. A way round this may be to step the tube slightly.
Any ideas to build on this - it would be interesting to experiment? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Eddie W Alfa 33
Joined: 31 Jul 2003 Posts: 375 Location: new zealand
|
Posted: Tue Jun 29, 2004 11:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
Being a cheapskate and an idiot I adapted a K&N from a beemer to our 1700. In the process of adapting the filterbox I added a second inlet on the r/h side with a hose to pick up more cool air from down beside the rad. Don't know if it makes a difference but the growl as it hits 4000 is something else. I work on the theory that the less restriction, then the less work the engine has to do as a suction pump.
Regards Eddie _________________ A LITTLE FURTHER A LITTLE FASTER |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Matt Stolton Alfa Sprint
Joined: 14 Mar 2003 Posts: 233 Location: London
|
Posted: Sat Jul 03, 2004 9:56 pm Post subject: Original S1/2 airbox is good |
|
|
The original s1/2 airbox is good, and does feature trumpets, even if they are bent through 90 degrees.
A large improvement can be had by flowing the aluminium castings, and radiusing the mouth of the trumpets. Further more the airbox itself can be 'flowed' to minimise its effect on air entering the trumpets.
Lloyd at clovertech did a mod to a series 2, and put a slightly smaller rad in, with a larger fan. This increased the gap between the body work and the rad, to allow a trumpet to feed cold air directly into the filter. This worked very well, however the car is now up for a 16V conversion, as it appears to have run lean and holed a piston.
I would recomend anyone doing major mods to airflow to make sure the increased airflow is matched by your carbs ability to deliver petrol. It is likely to require rejetting, even if only a little, to stop the mixture leaning off at high rpm. _________________ Regards
Matt
Ex Alfa 33 'GTA' (P4 with Knobs On)
Now cruising in a 166 3.2 Ti!! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
87SprintQF Guest
|
Posted: Sun Aug 22, 2004 12:46 pm Post subject: Re: Original S1/2 airbox is good |
|
|
Matt Stolton wrote: |
The original s1/2 airbox is good, and does feature trumpets, even if they are bent through 90 degrees.
A large improvement can be had by flowing the aluminium castings, and radiusing the mouth of the trumpets. Further more the airbox itself can be 'flowed' to minimise its effect on air entering the trumpets.
Lloyd at clovertech did a mod to a series 2, and put a slightly smaller rad in, with a larger fan. This increased the gap between the body work and the rad, to allow a trumpet to feed cold air directly into the filter. This worked very well, however the car is now up for a 16V conversion, as it appears to have run lean and holed a piston.
I would recomend anyone doing major mods to airflow to make sure the increased airflow is matched by your carbs ability to deliver petrol. It is likely to require rejetting, even if only a little, to stop the mixture leaning off at high rpm. |
I was having alook at my airbox today and noticed the trumpets and alumining castings - the castings seemed quite rough, not smooth at all - they also seemed to have quite a thick wall - if i smoothed these out and increased the cold air flow would i nessecearily need to rejet the carbs? my sprint has the 36 wbbers not 40s like some of the 33's do - what do u think? is it worth doing on a stock(ish) car? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Matt Stolton Alfa Sprint
Joined: 14 Mar 2003 Posts: 233 Location: London
|
Posted: Mon Aug 23, 2004 7:06 pm Post subject: Yes |
|
|
The bottom end, as long as it is not inherently noisy or known to be worn, is generally good for the few more horses that could be achieved through messing around with the air box.
The trumpets are very 'roughly' casted, and can be radically improved from simple grinding. You do not want mirror smooth, more so you can see the fine scratches left by 400-800 grit paper. Theory is that metal to air friction value is higher than air to air, as rough metal will 'hold' a layer of air static over it. Smooth metal looses it grip on its air cushion, and you have friction between air and metal.
I would only radius the first 1-2 cm of the trumpet, and try and keep the rest evenly tubelike. Once the air is in from the trumpet, it will gain speed in a constant pressure behind it. Yoo may even want it to taper gently to a slightly smaller end diameter to exactly match the top of your carb. This will assist gas speed a little further, assisting torque.
If you read Les the Gringo's site, he has many tips and diagrams that explain the theory better than I can repeat them, but he also mentions how cheap, in terms of BHP per pound, rolling road tuning is. If you go down the improved airbox route, it is pointless getting more air into your carb, if there isn't fuel to match. Mapping for injected cars, and rejetting for carbs, on a rolling road has got to be the way forward. _________________ Regards
Matt
Ex Alfa 33 'GTA' (P4 with Knobs On)
Now cruising in a 166 3.2 Ti!! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tvatavuk Gold Cloverleaf
Joined: 13 Mar 2003 Posts: 673 Location: Split, Croatia
|
Posted: Tue Aug 24, 2004 10:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
James Granger wrote: |
I'm tempted to run a long tube from the filter box down to the small grille near the RHS foglight - basically a ram pipe. This would mean a totally free air supply. The drawbacks are that the lack of anything in front of the inlet (other than that small grille), would result in the filter getting potentially very dirty. At the moment the bumper protects flies, spray, and other stuff from being sucked up into the filter housing. Therefore if I do go down this route, I'd probably fit very fine gauze over the inlet hole, although even this would not stop spray from being sucked in. A way round this may be to step the tube slightly.
Any ideas to build on this - it would be interesting to experiment? |
One way of doing it (pictures from another post here)
http://public.fotki.com/DINO33/33/33_extreme.html _________________ Tino Vatavuk
Little black dress which replaced Alfa Romeo 33 S 16v Permanent 4 GMo |
|
Back to top |
|
|
RFlower Alfa 33
Joined: 17 Feb 2004 Posts: 432 Location: S of France
|
Posted: Tue Aug 24, 2004 1:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
James Granger wrote: |
I'd probably fit very fine gauze over the inlet hole |
If you do this you will reduce the inlet area by the area covered by the wires of the mesh, which is quite significant, so the total area of the intake should be increased to compensate. Actually the effective area is reduced even more by the mesh because of turbulence around the wires.
Fine mesh will also block up more quickly, but then again the best filter, as far as removing particles is concerned, is one that is nearly blocked
Years ago, in the middle east, I fitted a large oil bath air filter ahead of the normal filter on my Triumph Herald (lots of room under the bonnet) because of sand blocking the filter. It was quite successful, but I don't know if the extra restriction reduced engine power. I hoped the paper filter's not getting dirty would compensate for this. _________________ Dick Flower, Nr. Carcassonne. '94 Trofeo 1.4 ie (F), '93 Imola 1.3/1.4 ie (now for breaking) (F), '91 1.7 ie (GB)(spare car), '86 Sprint 1.5 QV (F). '87 VW Syncro camper (F), '73 NSU Ro80 (F), '99 Fiat Seicento (F) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
paddy granger Alfa Sprint
Joined: 12 Aug 2003 Posts: 248
|
Posted: Thu Sep 02, 2004 1:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
RFlower wrote: |
James Granger wrote: |
I'd probably fit very fine gauze over the inlet hole |
...Fine mesh will also block up more quickly, but then again the best filter, as far as removing particles is concerned, is one that is nearly blocked ...
|
I think that K&N have found the trick with their oil covering. Excellent filtering, with low resistance. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|